From the perspective of Western medicine, the best current way to treat hyperacusis (once other options have been ruled out depending on its cause) is through auditory desensitization therapies, which retrain the brain not to interpret sounds as loud, annoying, and/or painful when they are not for a healthy person. This treatment works thanks to brain plasticity, that is, the brain’s ability to form new neural networks based on the external stimuli it receives.
There are different approaches to carrying out these therapies, but they are all basically based on the same idea: gradually increasing the volume and exposure time of broadband sounds.
Here, I will detail the treatment I have created. I started from various ideas from existing auditory therapies, and through experimentation, I corrected some things and added others over several years and iterations to arrive at the simplest method that has worked best for me. However, each case has its particularities, and it may be necessary to make some adjustments to suit individual needs. Throughout this article and the rest of the blog, I will provide the foundational knowledge so that, if needed, you can personalize the treatment.
This treatment is appropriate for hyperacusis caused by acoustic trauma, which is the most common cause. Auditory desensitization therapies are also valid for other cases, but depending on the cause, the treatment might be very different. In any case, consult your specialist to determine the best approach for your particular situation.
The principles on which my method for treating hyperacusis is based are the following:
- Continuous control of sound exposure.
- Progressive exposure to sounds that we find intolerable.
- Treatment of the psycho-emotional component.
It is necessary to take the required measures to control the amount of sound we are exposed to in daily life, avoiding both overexposure and overprotection as much as possible. Exposing the ears uncontrollably to more sound than they can tolerate will cause relapses and leave the ears sore and more sensitive. Conversely, overusing silence or hearing protection, or avoiding certain sounds altogether, will prevent adaptation and make our ears more sensitive. In both cases, over time, our sound tolerance threshold will decrease. The goal, therefore, is to avoid both extremes and provide the brain with the best possible sound environment for brain plasticity to take place. Control over exposure is achieved primarily through the use of hearing protection and avoiding sound environments that excessively exceed our tolerance threshold.
This is the main differentiating element of my method compared to other approaches for treating hyperacusis, which often lack specific guidance beyond vague recommendations to avoid very loud noises and not overuse hearing protection. Continuous control of sound exposure allows for faster recovery (sometimes achieving results in just a few days), compared to other approaches such as TRT (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy), where several people report no improvement in the first six months of treatment. Additionally, it prevents many symptoms associated with hyperacusis, such as intense pain, ear fullness, or sound distortion, which can be very difficult to endure. However, its downside is that, especially in severe hyperacusis cases, finding the balance between overprotection and overexposure can be complicated and exhausting, and depending on the sound environment and personal circumstances, it may even be impracticable. In such cases, other therapy methods like PET are recommended.
To recover from hyperacusis, continuous control of sound exposure alone is not enough, as it only prevents worsening. We need something that allows us to restore normal sound tolerance, and this is where sound therapy comes into play. To improve sound tolerance, one must be gradually and carefully exposed to sounds that are uncomfortable or intolerable, whether because their intensity exceeds our tolerance threshold, prolonged exposure fatigues our ears, or their frequency content is harder for us to bear. While continuous sound exposure control provides the optimal environment for brain plasticity to occur, progressive exposure to intolerable sounds provides the proper stimuli for the brain to relearn to listen normally. These are the signals the brain receives, indicating it needs to adapt to those stimuli.
This relearning process is similar to a gymnast improving flexibility to perform, for example, a split. By daily practice—pushing slightly beyond current limits—the exercise can eventually be performed. Forcing beyond one’s current capacity would cause injury and require rest before attempting again. Conversely, ceasing practice would result in the gradual loss of gained flexibility.
Thus, by exposing our ears daily to sounds that may cause some discomfort but are not excessive for the brain, the brain starts to form new neural networks to adapt to these sounds, eventually handling them without pain or other bothersome symptoms.
Although hyperacusis is not a manifestation of a psychological disorder, it can have a psycho-emotional component whose impact, if untreated, could undermine all the progress made through sound therapy. This component relates to any established negative emotional response to sound that developed as a consequence of hyperacusis. Depending on the nature of this response, it may be classified as misophonia or phonophobia.
In mild hyperacusis, where the impact on daily life is lower, the psycho-emotional aspect may not be as decisive. However, in my view, any sound therapy for hyperacusis that ignores this component has a high likelihood of failure. Since most hyperacusis treatments I’ve encountered neglect this point and only provide brief instructions to listen to broad-spectrum sounds, addressing the psycho-emotional component is one of the most important aspects of my method.
No comments:
Post a Comment